Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to LightPath Technologies, Inc.
How LightPath Technologies, Inc. stacks up
LPTH · against 1,668 other Technology companies
Growth
92/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #127 of 1,669 · scores higher than 92% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score175 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including LPTH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 92?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- Still loss-making, but the loss per share narrowed. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 94% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 29.6% vs peer median 4.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 98% of peers. Revenue growth: 92.8% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LPTH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LPTH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,689 reported | 92.8% | 8.5% | 98% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,071 reported | Not reported | 11.1% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,659 reported | 29.6% | 4.8% | 94% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LPTH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 127 | 76.2B CNY (≈$10.7B) | 92 | 77 | |
| 127 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score