Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Loar Holdings Inc.
How Loar Holdings Inc. stacks up
LOAR · against 2,393 other Industrials companies
Valuation
18/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #1,952 of 2,394 · scores higher than 18% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score197 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including LOAR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 18?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 76% of peers. EBITDA yield: 1.9% vs peer median 6.9%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -0.1% vs peer median 3.8%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 67% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 1.7% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LOAR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LOAR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 2,368 reported | 1.0% | 3.8% | 25% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2,432 reported | 3.0% | 7.0% | 24% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 795 reported | 1.7% | 3.7% | 33% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 2,381 reported | 18.7% | 50.5% | 16% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LOAR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1,952 | 6.1B CNY (≈$852M) | 18 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score