Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Alliant Energy Corporation
How Alliant Energy Corporation stacks up
LNT · against 89 other Utilities companies listed in US-listed
Growth
51/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #69 of 90 · scores higher than 24% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score18 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including LNT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Its metrics sit close to the Utilities norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -2.7% vs peer median 1.7%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 1.9% vs peer median 2.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 67% of peers. Revenue growth: 6.9% vs peer median 2.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LNT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LNT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 91 reported | 6.9% | 7.4% | 46% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 76 reported | -2.7% | 2.8% | 33% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 89 reported | 1.9% | 4.0% | 32% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LNT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.1B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 2 | 2.5B USD | 99 | 41 | |
| 3 | 29.7B USD | 98 | 57 | |
| 3 | 1.5B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 3 | 5.4B USD | 98 | 77 | |
| 65 | 230M USD | 53 | 37 | |
| 66 | 52.0B USD | 52 | 39 | |
| 66 | 19.7B USD | 52 | 46 | |
| 66 | 15.5B USD | 52 | 72 | |
| 69 | 18.7B USD | 51 | 37 | |
| 70 | 1.1B USD | 50 | 51 | |
| 70 | 6.7B USD | 50 | 59 | |
| 70 | 46.9B USD | 50 | 45 | |
| 73 | 49.2B USD | 49 | 38 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score