Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lockheed Martin Corporation
How Lockheed Martin Corporation stacks up
LMT · against 445 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
70/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #173 of 446 · scores higher than 60% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score45 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including LMT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 70?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Industrials peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.5% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.2% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 83% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 51.3% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LMT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LMT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 462 reported | 7.2% | 8.4% | 46% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 328 reported | 51.3% | 9.2% | 78% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 437 reported | 4.5% | 5.2% | 46% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LMT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 727M USD | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 170 | 4.7B USD | 71 | 28 | |
| 173 | 14.4B USD | 70 | 40 | |
| 173 | 7.8B USD | 70 | 82 | |
| 173 | 745M USD | 70 | 36 | |
| 173 | 147.5B USD | 70 | 54 | |
| 173 | 49.3B USD | 70 | 51 | |
| 178 | 7.2B USD | 69 | 61 | |
| 178 | 152.1B USD | 69 | 49 | |
| 178 | 1.7B USD | 69 | 70 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score