Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LMNR · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #413 of 802 · scores higher than 49% of peers · safety percentile 49
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)80 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including LMNR · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Defensive norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LMNR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 0.68× | 0.44× | 36% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | 0.31 | 0.32 | 52% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 1.51× | 1.53× | 48% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 409 | 11.0B TRY (≈$330M) | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 25 |
| 410 | 11.1B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 49 | 73 |
| 411 | 447M EUR (≈$491M) | 49 | 57 |
| 412 | 81.9B HKD (≈$10.5B) | 49 | 48 |
| 413 | 182M USD | 49 | 16 |
| 414 | 1.6B USD | 48 | 65 |
| 415 | 53.4B INR (≈$640M) | 48 | 49 |
| 416 | 434M EUR (≈$478M) | 48 | 66 |
| 417 | 3.8B EUR (≈$4.2B) | 48 | 70 |