Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LION · against 64 other Miscellaneous companies
Ranked #61 of 65 · scores higher than 6% of peers · safety percentile 6
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)7 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including LION · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Miscellaneous peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LION | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 59 reported | Not reported | 0.52× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 63 reported | Not reported | 0.53 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 63 reported | Not reported | 1.21× | — | — | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unavailable | 100 | ||
| 2 | 387.9B INR (≈$4.7B) | 98 | 67 | |
| 3 | Unavailable | 97 | ||
| 4 | Unavailable | 95 | ||
| 5 | Unavailable | 94 | ||
| 57 | Unavailable | 13 | 25 | |
| 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| Unavailable |
| 11 |
| 59 | Unavailable | 9 |
| 60 | Unavailable | 8 | 28 |
| 61 | 3.7B USD | 6 | 30 |
| 62 | Unavailable | 5 |
| 63 | Unavailable | 3 |
| 64 | Unavailable | 2 |
| 65 | Unavailable | 0 | 26 |