Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lionsgate Studios Corp.
How Lionsgate Studios Corp. stacks up
LION · against 10 other Miscellaneous companies of similar size
Growth
43/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #8 of 11 · scores higher than 30% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score2 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including LION · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Miscellaneous companies.Its metrics sit close to the Miscellaneous norm.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 77% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -5.1% vs peer median 3.4%
- Still loss-making, but the loss per share narrowed. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 12.6%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 9.9% vs peer median 5.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LION, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LION | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 11 reported | 9.9% | 9.1% | 60% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 6 reported | Not reported | 66.5% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 11 reported | -5.1% | 3.6% | 20% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LION| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 98 | ||
| 2 | 2.0B GBP (≈$2.6B) | 93 | ||
| 3 | 1.9B GBP (≈$2.5B) | 81 | ||
| 4 | 4.01T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 68 | ||
| 5 | 387.9B INR (≈$4.7B) | 65 | 67 | |
| 6 | 69.2B MXN (≈$3.7B) | 62 | ||
| 7 | 3.2B USD | 48 | 45 | |
| 8 | 3.7B USD | 43 | 30 | |
| 9 | 954.8B JPY (≈$6.5B) | 37 | 46 | |
| 10 | 9.51T KRW (≈$6.8B) | 20 | ||
| 11 | 7.09T KRW (≈$5.1B) | 7 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score