Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Avista Corporation
How Avista Corporation stacks up
AVA · against 84 other Miscellaneous companies
Growth
48/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #45 of 85 · scores higher than 48% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score8 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including AVA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Miscellaneous companies.A mix: stronger earnings per share growth, but weaker revenue growth than most Miscellaneous peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 67% of peers. Revenue growth: -1.8% vs peer median 5.8%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.6% vs peer median 3.4%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 62% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 22.8% vs peer median 12.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AVA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AVA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 88 reported | -1.8% | 5.8% | 33% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 46 reported | 22.8% | 12.6% | 62% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 79 reported | 3.6% | 3.4% | 53% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AVA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | ||
| 2 | 1.35T KRW (≈$975M) | 99 | ||
| 3 | 6.6B USD | 98 | ||
| 4 | 506M GBP (≈$658M) | 96 | ||
| 5 | 14.1B USD | 95 | ||
| 41 | 50.6B KRW (≈$36M) | 52 | ||
| 42 | 303.9B KRW (≈$219M) | 51 | ||
| 43 | 220.2B KRW (≈$159M) | 50 | ||
| 44 | Unavailable | 49 | ||
| 45 | 3.2B USD | 48 | 45 | |
| 46 | Unavailable | 46 | ||
| 47 | 631.1B KRW (≈$454M) | 45 | ||
| 48 | 246.6B KRW (≈$178M) | 44 | ||
| 49 | 3.7B USD | 43 | 30 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score