Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Life360, Inc.
How Life360, Inc. stacks up
LIF · against 392 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
39/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #250 of 393 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score53 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including LIF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 39?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Technology peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 77% of peers. EBITDA yield: 0.7% vs peer median 4.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.8% vs peer median 2.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 66% of peers. Earnings yield: 4.0% vs peer median 2.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LIF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LIF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 386 reported | 3.8% | 2.4% | 67% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 396 reported | 0.7% | 4.5% | 15% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 174 reported | 2.7% | 3.3% | 46% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 388 reported | 16.8% | 28.1% | 27% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LIFScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score