Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Li Auto Inc.
How Li Auto Inc. stacks up
LI · against 162 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
69/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #39 of 163 · scores higher than 76% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score21 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including LI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 69?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 99% of peers. EBITDA yield: 20.1% vs peer median 8.8%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -17.5% vs peer median 6.1%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 71% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.6% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 162 reported | Not reported | 5.0% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 166 reported | -58.9% | 8.6% | 1% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 88 reported | -20.6% | 5.8% | 1% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 163 reported | 99.1% | 32.2% | 86% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 150.1B HKD (≈$19.2B) | 97 | 79 | |
| 3 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 3 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 35 | 19.7B USD | 70 | 62 | |
| 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score