Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LI · against 165 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #30 of 166 · scores higher than 82% of peers · safety percentile 73
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)15 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including LI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 163 reported | 0.22× | 0.70× | 77% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 166 reported | 0.54 | 0.89 | 73% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 162 reported | 1.81× | 1.38× | 68% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.75T JPY (≈$11.9B) | 97 | 51 | |
| 2 | 7.3B SGD (≈$5.5B) | 97 | 69 | |
| 3 | 9.5B CHF (≈$10.9B) | 96 | 37 | |
| 4 | 112.0B CNY (≈$15.7B) | 95 | 53 | |
| 5 | 7.8B EUR (≈$8.6B) | 94 | 61 | |
| 26 | 12.2B USD | 77 | 60 | |
| 27 | 155.0B SEK (≈$15.5B) | 73 | 71 | |
| 27 | 271.2B MXN (≈$14.6B) | 73 | 70 | |
| 29 | 13.8B USD | 73 | 70 | |
| 30 | 10.9B USD | 73 | 47 | |
| 31 | 1.62T INR (≈$19.4B) | 72 | 65 | |
| 32 | 9.5B USD | 72 | 66 | |
| 33 | 1.46T INR (≈$17.6B) | 72 | 54 | |
| 34 | 52.0B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 70 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score