Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
How L3Harris Technologies, Inc. stacks up
LHX · against 107 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
95/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #3 of 108 · scores higher than 96% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score12 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including LHX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 95?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 11.0% vs peer median 7.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 96% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 29.6% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 98% of peers. Revenue growth: 83.2% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LHX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LHX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 108 reported | 83.2% | 7.0% | 98% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 98 reported | 11.0% | 7.8% | 61% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 107 reported | 29.6% | 6.4% | 95% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LHX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 2 | 90.8B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 3 | 63.3B CAD (≈$46.2B) | 95 | 56 | |
| 3 | 51.7B USD | 95 | 58 | |
| 3 | 34.8B USD | 95 | 49 | |
| 6 | 354.4B SEK (≈$35.4B) | 93 | 58 | |
| 7 | 1.56T TRY (≈$46.9B) | 91 | 62 | |
| 7 | 71.0B USD | 91 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score