Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to LGI Homes, Inc.
How LGI Homes, Inc. stacks up
LGIH · against 532 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
43/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #303 of 533 · scores higher than 42% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score40 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including LGIH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield and earnings yield, but weaker EBITDA yield than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 82% of peers. EBITDA yield: 3.3% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 69% of peers. Earnings yield: 6.5% vs peer median 4.4%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 78% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 13.0% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LGIH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LGIH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 531 reported | 6.6% | 4.7% | 67% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 545 reported | 2.9% | 9.1% | 17% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 143 reported | 13.0% | 7.4% | 73% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 531 reported | 210.8% | 60.2% | 96% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LGIH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 4.1B HKD (≈$522M) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 4.6B HKD (≈$593M) | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 303 | 5.4B CNY (≈$754M) | 43 | 49 | |
| 303 | 230.2B JPY (≈$1.6B) | 43 | 61 | |
| 303 | 1.3B USD | 43 | 44 | |
| 303 | 1.1B USD | 43 | 35 | |
| 303 | 1.0B USD | 43 | 37 | |
| 309 | 60.1B TWD (≈$1.9B) | 42 | 39 | |
| 309 | 3.7B CNY (≈$525M) | 42 | 72 | |
| 309 | 4.8B CNY (≈$667M) | 42 | 55 | |
| 309 | 93.2B JPY (≈$634M) | 42 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score