Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LFUS · against 238 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #95 of 239 · scores higher than 61% of peers · safety percentile 50
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)31 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including LFUS · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LFUS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 230 reported | 0.27× | 0.34× | 57% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 227 reported | 1.48 | 1.02 | 22% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 237 reported | 2.76× | 1.67× | 78% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 2 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 3 | 2.60T JPY (≈$17.7B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 4 | 9.1B USD | 98 | 87 | |
| 5 | 40.0B CNY (≈$5.6B) | 97 | 82 | |
| 91 | 387.7B TWD (≈$12.0B) | 53 | 54 | |
| 92 | 6.8B USD | 52 | 52 | |
| 93 | 143.1B HKD (≈$18.3B) | 51 | 64 | |
| 94 | 271.6B TWD (≈$8.4B) | 51 | 45 | |
| 95 | 10.5B USD | 50 | 36 | |
| 96 | 6.5B USD | 50 | 69 | |
| 97 | 1.74T JPY (≈$11.9B) | 49 | 64 | |
| 98 | 256.8B TWD (≈$8.0B) | 49 | 65 | |
| 99 | 5.8B USD | 49 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score