Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Levi Strauss & Co.
How Levi Strauss & Co. stacks up
LEVI · against 200 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
12/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #193 of 201 · scores higher than 4% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score12 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including LEVI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 12?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 1.1% vs peer median 8.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 0.7% vs peer median 6.1%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 70% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.6% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LEVI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LEVI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 198 reported | 6.6% | 4.9% | 71% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 204 reported | 9.1% | 8.6% | 54% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 110 reported | 6.4% | 6.3% | 51% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 198 reported | 25.8% | 32.2% | 41% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LEVI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 3 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 5 | 6.99T KRW (≈$5.0B) | 95 | 78 | |
| 189 | 17.5B USD | 14 | 18 | |
| 189 | 4.8B USD | 14 | 35 | |
| 189 | 7.8B EUR (≈$8.6B) | 14 | 61 | |
| 189 | 15.2B USD | 14 | 36 | |
| 193 | 8.8B USD | 12 | 55 | |
| 194 | 15.2B USD | 10 | 57 | |
| 195 | 11.5B EUR (≈$12.7B) | 9 | 28 | |
| 196 | 8.6B USD | 6 | 41 | |
| 196 | 8.0B USD | 6 | 26 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score