Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LEO · against 128 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Ranked #88 of 129 · scores higher than 32% of peers · safety percentile 44
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)16 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including LEO · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker current ratio than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LEO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 108 reported | 0.33× | 0.54× | 62% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 122 reported | 0.62 | 0.60 | 45% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 125 reported | 0.12× | 2.24× | 2% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.0B AUD (≈$674M) | 100 | ||
| 2 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 352.8B KRW (≈$254M) | 98 | ||
| 4 | 466M AUD (≈$308M) | 98 | ||
| 5 | 566M AUD (≈$374M) | 97 | 84 | |
| 84 | 371M USD | 46 | ||
| 85 | 551M USD | 45 | ||
| 86 | 492M USD | 45 | ||
| 87 | 322M USD | 44 | ||
| 88 | 371M USD | 44 | ||
| 89 | 476M USD | 43 | ||
| 90 | 527M AUD (≈$348M) | 42 | 64 | |
| 91 | 528M USD | 41 | ||
| 92 | 709M USD | 41 | 32 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score