Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IIM · against 398 other Financial Services companies
Ranked #235 of 399 · scores higher than 41% of peers · safety percentile 41
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)39 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including IIM · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IIM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 349 reported | 0.51× | 0.57× | 54% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 394 reported | 0.77 | 0.67 | 40% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 372 reported | 0.92× | 2.04× | 16% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 344M MYR (≈$76M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 2 | 1.0B AUD (≈$674M) | 100 | ||
| 3 | 24.8B JPY (≈$168M) | 99 | 25 | |
| 4 | 0M MYR (≈$0M) | 99 | ||
| 5 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 231 | 527M AUD (≈$348M) | 42 | 64 | |
| 232 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1.0B USD |
| 42 |
| 48 |
| 233 | 7.1B USD | 42 | 68 |
| 234 | 1.5B USD | 41 | 58 |
| 235 | 528M USD | 41 |
| 236 | 3.37T KRW (≈$2.4B) | 41 | 26 |
| 237 | 709M USD | 41 | 32 |
| 238 | 499M USD | 40 |
| 239 | 1.4B EUR (≈$1.5B) | 40 | 48 |