Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LEA · against 218 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #22 of 219 · scores higher than 89% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score17 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including LEA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | LEA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 216 reported | 9.2% | 5.0% | 85% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 222 reported | 20.1% | 9.0% | 92% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 118 reported | 10.9% | 6.3% | 85% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 216 reported | 89.6% | 33.4% | 82% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 3 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 5 | 6.99T KRW (≈$5.0B) | 95 | 78 | |
| 19 | 4.5B GBP (≈$5.8B) | 89 | 56 | |
| 19 | 11.8B USD | 89 | 73 | |
| 22 | 1.40T JPY (≈$9.5B) | 87 | 61 | |
| 22 | 1.82T JPY (≈$12.4B) | 87 | 57 | |
| 22 | 7.8B USD | 87 | 49 | |
| 25 | 4.8B USD | 86 | 67 | |
| 26 | 58.7B HKD (≈$7.5B) | 85 | 67 | |
| 27 | 42.5B BRL (≈$7.6B) | 84 | 45 | |
| 28 | 1.67T JPY (≈$11.4B) | 82 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score