Ranked #33 of 405 · scores higher than 91% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
50 peers with a profitability score of 90–100, including LAZ · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 93?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly thanks to its return on equity and return on assets, which are stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▲a higher return on assets: stronger than 91% of peers. Return on assets: 5.2% vs peer median 1.2%
▲a higher return on shareholders' equity: stronger than 94% of peers. Return on equity: 24.8% vs peer median 10.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LAZ, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
LAZ
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 374 reported
16.1%
11.6%
69%
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 75 reported
9.5%
8.7%
54%
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 408 reported
5.2%
1.2%
90%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 400 reported
25.7%
11.7%
94%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 411 reported
89.5%
0.0%
93%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
