Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LAUR · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #477 of 802 · scores higher than 41% of peers · safety percentile 41
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)80 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including LAUR · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Defensive norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LAUR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 0.64× | 0.44× | 38% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | 0.47 | 0.32 | 32% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 0.71× | 1.53× | 9% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 473 | 5.4B CNY (≈$762M) | 41 | 33 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 474 | 861.7B MXN (≈$46.5B) | 41 | 60 |
| 475 | 1.9B HKD (≈$245M) | 41 | 25 |
| 476 | 98.3B TRY (≈$3.0B) | 41 | 53 |
| 477 | 4.9B USD | 41 | 71 |
| 478 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 40 | 82 |
| 479 | 45.2B JPY (≈$307M) | 40 | 64 |
| 480 | 5.1B CHF (≈$5.8B) | 40 | 52 |
| 481 | 82.9B HKD (≈$10.6B) | 40 | 51 |