Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lamar Advertising Company
How Lamar Advertising Company stacks up
LAMR · against 58 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
40/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #34 of 59 · scores higher than 43% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score11 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including LAMR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 40?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 68% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.5% vs peer median 6.5%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 61% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.5% vs peer median 5.3%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.6% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LAMR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LAMR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 60 reported | 3.5% | 4.0% | 42% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 57 reported | 5.1% | 5.5% | 32% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 40 reported | 4.5% | 5.4% | 28% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 60 reported | 6.2% | 53.0% | 2% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LAMR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.85T JPY (≈$19.4B) | 90 | 67 | |
| 2 | 10.1B USD | 87 | 53 | |
| 3 | 13.7B USD | 81 | 70 | |
| 4 | 26.9B USD | 77 | 78 | |
| 4 | 13.8B EUR (≈$15.2B) | 77 | 36 | |
| 30 | 15.2B USD | 44 | 66 | |
| 30 | 19.6B USD | 44 | 48 | |
| 32 | 24.6B USD | 43 | 42 | |
| 33 | 1.06T INR (≈$12.7B) | 42 | 74 | |
| 34 | 15.9B USD | 40 | 49 | |
| 35 | 8.6B USD | 39 | 56 | |
| 35 | 11.7B USD | 39 | 49 | |
| 37 | 26.3B USD | 38 | 41 | |
| 37 | 10.0B USD | 38 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score