Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Quaker Chemical Corporation
How Quaker Chemical Corporation stacks up
KWR · against 221 other Basic Materials companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #112 of 222 · scores higher than 48% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score23 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including KWR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Basic Materials norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.8% vs peer median 3.6%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.7% vs peer median 8.5%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.9% vs peer median 2.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KWR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KWR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 211 reported | 3.8% | 3.0% | 54% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 216 reported | 8.6% | 8.9% | 49% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 196 reported | 2.9% | 2.3% | 56% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 212 reported | 53.5% | 45.5% | 58% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KWR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 1 | 768M USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 3 | 5.3B USD | 98 | 81 | |
| 4 | 7.9B USD | 96 | 62 | |
| 5 | 6.2B USD | 95 | 77 | |
| 108 | 35.5B USD | 47 | 60 | |
| 110 | 149.9B USD | 46 | 76 | |
| 110 | 5.8B USD | 46 | 80 | |
| 112 | 15.3B USD | 45 | 40 | |
| 112 | 2.6B USD | 45 | 51 | |
| 112 | 2.0B USD | 45 | 23 | |
| 112 | 30.3B USD | 45 | 59 | |
| 116 | 421M USD | 43 | 25 | |
| 116 | 3.3B USD | 43 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score