Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Kura Oncology, Inc.
How Kura Oncology, Inc. stacks up
KURA · against 454 other Healthcare companies listed in US-listed
Growth
56/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #266 of 455 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score45 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including KURA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 56?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.A mix: stronger revenue growth, but weaker earnings per share growth than most Healthcare peers.
- The loss per share widened. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 9.8%
- 3-year revenue growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 83% of peers. Revenue growth: 25.2% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KURA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KURA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 475 reported | 25.2% | 11.0% | 71% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 171 reported | Not reported | 21.2% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 433 reported | Not reported | 11.0% | — | — | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KURA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 464M USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 1.4B USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 2 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 2 | 8.8B USD | 99 | 31 | |
| 2 | 90M USD | 99 | 27 | |
| 262 | 11.6B USD | 57 | 56 | |
| 262 | 1.1B USD | 57 | 43 | |
| 262 | 302.7B USD | 57 | 63 | |
| 266 | 58.6B USD | 56 | 52 | |
| 266 | 879M USD | 56 | 36 | |
| 266 | 5.8B USD | 56 | 38 | |
| 266 | 2.0B USD | 56 | 26 | |
| 266 | 22.6B USD | 56 | 59 | |
| 271 | 28.7B USD | 55 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score