Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
KRT · against 1,584 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #543 of 1,585 · scores higher than 66% of peers · safety percentile 66
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)158 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including KRT · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | KRT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,521 reported | 0.42× | 0.50× | 56% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,556 reported | 0.76 | 0.56 | 37% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,545 reported | 2.25× | 1.48× | 75% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 2 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 2 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 100 | 74 | |
| 5 | 61M MYR (≈$13M) | 100 | 29 | |
| 539 | 378.4B JPY (≈$2.6B) | 66 | 68 | |
| 540 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 2.6B CNY (≈$367M) |
| 66 |
| 18 |
| 541 | 70.6B CNY (≈$9.9B) | 66 | 52 |
| 542 | 85M MYR (≈$19M) | 66 | 56 |
| 543 | 1.0B USD | 66 | 69 |
| 544 | 392.0B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 66 | 77 |
| 545 | 22.7B USD | 66 | 55 |
| 546 | 260.6B JPY (≈$1.8B) | 66 | 69 |
| 547 | 5.5B CNY (≈$768M) | 66 | 44 |