Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Koppers Holdings Inc.
How Koppers Holdings Inc. stacks up
KOP · against 1,320 other Basic Materials companies
Valuation
54/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #602 of 1,321 · scores higher than 54% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score132 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including KOP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Basic Materials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -11.0% vs peer median 3.6%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 80% of peers. EBITDA yield: 2.0% vs peer median 8.5%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 92% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 17.5% vs peer median 2.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KOP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KOP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,281 reported | -11.1% | 3.8% | 9% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,352 reported | 15.1% | 8.6% | 80% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 409 reported | 17.5% | 2.6% | 92% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,275 reported | 49.0% | 61.0% | 39% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KOP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 577.1B KRW (≈$416M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 219M MYR (≈$48M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 63M MYR (≈$14M) | 100 | 68 | |
| 1 | 1.39T ARS (≈$1.4B) | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 224.2B CLP (≈$247M) | 100 | 47 | |
| 602 | 3.8B CNY (≈$527M) | 54 | 54 | |
| 602 | 10.5B EUR (≈$11.5B) | 54 | 37 | |
| 602 | 2.35T CLP (≈$2.6B) | 54 | 35 | |
| 602 | 32.3B SEK (≈$3.2B) | 54 | 47 | |
| 602 | 791M USD | 54 | 22 | |
| 602 | 815M USD | 54 | 67 | |
| 602 | 1.0B USD | 54 | 70 | |
| 602 | 8.1B USD | 54 | 66 | |
| 615 | 20.3B CNY (≈$2.8B) | 53 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score