Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Eastman Kodak Company
How Eastman Kodak Company stacks up
KODK · against 472 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
76/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #54 of 473 · scores higher than 88% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score25 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including KODK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 76?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -11.1% vs peer median 3.8%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 95% of peers. EBITDA yield: 9.3% vs peer median 6.9%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 98% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 54.7% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KODK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KODK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 468 reported | -15.9% | 3.0% | 11% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 472 reported | 22.7% | 6.3% | 99% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 430 reported | 54.7% | 3.3% | 100% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 466 reported | 73.4% | 32.3% | 81% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KODK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 51 | 4.3B USD | 77 | 64 | |
| 51 | 8.8B USD | 77 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score