Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
KO · against 6 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #3 of 7 · scores higher than 67% of peers · safety percentile 30
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)2 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including KO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, which is weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | KO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 6 reported | 1.16× | 0.57× | 20% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 7 reported | 0.34 | 0.40 | 83% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 7 reported | 1.30× | 0.98× | 83% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.57T CNY (≈$220.3B) | 95 | 73 | |
| 2 | 343.3B USD | 33 | 52 | |
| 3 | 369.2B USD | 30 | 54 | |
| 4 | 417.7B USD | 25 | 52 | |
| 5 | 199.4B EUR (≈$219.4B) | 19 | 44 | |
| 6 | 194.4B CHF (≈$223.5B) | 9 | 36 | |
| 7 | 300.3B USD | 7 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 54 |