Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
How Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. stacks up
KNX · against 317 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #199 of 318 · scores higher than 36% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score55 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including KNX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Industrials peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 78% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.4% vs peer median 3.8%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.4% vs peer median 6.9%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 64% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 5.3% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KNX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KNX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 305 reported | 0.4% | 4.2% | 6% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 318 reported | 8.2% | 7.4% | 59% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 160 reported | 5.3% | 3.9% | 67% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 303 reported | 68.3% | 33.3% | 81% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KNX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 2 | 9.3B SGD (≈$7.1B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 3 | 49.8B HKD (≈$6.4B) | 98 | 74 | |
| 3 | 82.6B NOK (≈$7.8B) | 98 | 74 | |
| 5 | 157.6B HKD (≈$20.2B) | 97 | 67 | |
| 199 | 1.94T JPY (≈$13.2B) | 45 | 51 | |
| 199 | 16.1B USD | 45 | 58 | |
| 199 | 13.4B USD | 45 | 62 | |
| 199 | 12.5B USD | 45 | 56 | |
| 199 | 10.2B USD | 45 | 28 | |
| 199 | 6.8B GBP (≈$8.9B) | 45 | 47 | |
| 205 | 8.5B USD | 44 | 31 | |
| 205 | 15.6B USD | 44 | 46 | |
| 205 | 5.5B GBP (≈$7.2B) | 44 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score