Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Kennametal Inc.
How Kennametal Inc. stacks up
KMT · against 646 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
92/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #41 of 647 · scores higher than 93% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score54 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including KMT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 92?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -3.5% vs peer median 3.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 93% of peers. EBITDA yield: 21.1% vs peer median 6.9%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 96% of peers. Earnings yield: 15.1% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KMT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KMT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 642 reported | 14.5% | 4.5% | 97% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 654 reported | 20.4% | 7.9% | 94% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 187 reported | -3.5% | 4.3% | 19% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 642 reported | 67.5% | 49.1% | 65% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KMT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 37 | 12.4B NOK (≈$1.2B) | 93 | 52 | |
| 41 | 324.2B JPY (≈$2.2B) | 92 | 51 | |
| 41 | 66.7B TRY (≈$2.0B) | 92 | 56 | |
| 41 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.3B) | 92 | 48 | |
| 41 | 2.3B USD | 92 | 82 | |
| 41 | 3.3B USD | 92 | 79 | |
| 46 | 1.5B EUR (≈$1.6B) | 91 | 63 | |
| 46 | 1.9B USD | 91 | 69 | |
| 46 | 2.4B USD | 91 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score