Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
KMI · against 32 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #28 of 33 · scores higher than 16% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score5 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including KMI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
| Metric | KMI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 33 reported | 4.7% | 6.8% | 31% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 33 reported | 7.2% | 10.1% | 16% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 29 reported | 4.3% | 5.7% | 29% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 31 reported | 43.3% | 38.0% | 73% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.14T HKD (≈$146.3B) | 98 | 79 | |
| 2 | 108.0B USD | 79 | 55 | |
| 3 | 60.4B USD | 77 | 77 | |
| 4 | 135.8B USD | 76 | 60 | |
| 5 | 81.4B USD | 69 | 78 | |
| 24 | 66.8B USD | 32 | 49 | |
| 25 | 53.9B USD | 31 | 42 | |
| 26 | 77.4B USD | 30 | 43 | |
| 27 | 433.8B BRL (≈$78.1B) | 28 | 41 | |
| 28 | 73.2B USD | 26 | 44 | |
| 29 | 404.0B BRL (≈$72.7B) | 25 | 39 | |
| 30 | 66.1B USD | 22 | 45 | |
| 31 | 109.1B USD | 20 | 37 | |
| 32 | 64.0B USD | 19 | 37 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score