Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
KLIC · against 389 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #118 of 390 · scores higher than 70% of peers · safety percentile 67
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)39 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including KLIC · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio and debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | KLIC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 376 reported | 0.04× | 0.30× | 82% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 375 reported | 1.62 | 0.98 | 15% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 386 reported | 3.44× | 1.84× | 81% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 2 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 3 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 114 | 28.7B CNY (≈$4.0B) | 67 | 28 | |
| 115 | 13.8B CNY (≈$1.9B) | 67 | 54 | |
| 116 | 2.1B USD | 67 | 64 | |
| 117 | 76.2B TWD (≈$2.4B) | 67 | 72 | |
| 118 | 3.8B USD | 67 | 74 | |
| 119 | 641.0B JPY (≈$4.4B) | 66 | 70 | |
| 120 | 2.3B USD | 65 | 79 | |
| 121 | 14.5B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 65 | 35 | |
| 122 | 4.0B USD | 65 | 84 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score