Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
KKR · against 398 other Financial Services companies
Ranked #335 of 399 · scores higher than 16% of peers · safety percentile 16
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including KKR · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | KKR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 349 reported | 0.70× | 0.57× | 45% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 394 reported | 1.79 | 0.67 | 4% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 372 reported | 0.86× | 2.04× | 15% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 344M MYR (≈$76M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 2 | 1.0B AUD (≈$674M) | 100 | ||
| 3 | 24.8B JPY (≈$168M) | 99 | 25 | |
| 4 | 0M MYR (≈$0M) | 99 | ||
| 5 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 331 | 24.5B USD | 17 | 47 | |
| 332 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 16.9B CHF (≈$19.5B) |
| 17 |
| 56 |
| 333 | 34.4B CNY (≈$4.8B) | 17 | 40 |
| 334 | 4.9B USD | 16 | 18 |
| 335 | 88.7B USD | 16 | 39 |
| 336 | 219M USD | 16 | 20 |
| 337 | 16.2B USD | 16 | 37 |
| 338 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 15 | 48 |
| 339 | 405M USD | 15 | 57 |