Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Kirby Corporation
How Kirby Corporation stacks up
KEX · against 386 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
60/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #187 of 387 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score49 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including KEX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 60?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Industrials peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.1% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.6% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 70% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 23.9% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KEX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KEX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 388 reported | 6.6% | 6.5% | 51% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 341 reported | 23.9% | 9.0% | 71% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 382 reported | 5.1% | 6.8% | 41% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KEX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 100 | 58 | |
| 4 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 99 | 73 | |
| 4 | 6.1B USD | 99 | 55 | |
| 187 | 985.6B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 60 | 63 | |
| 187 | 553.5B JPY (≈$3.8B) | 60 | 70 | |
| 187 | 23.4B MYR (≈$5.1B) | 60 | 46 | |
| 187 | 146.6B TWD (≈$4.5B) | 60 | 51 | |
| 187 | 7.4B USD | 60 | 60 | |
| 193 | 37.7B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 59 | 66 | |
| 193 | 994.9B JPY (≈$6.8B) | 59 | 61 | |
| 193 | 323.3B INR (≈$3.9B) | 59 | 53 | |
| 193 | 659.8B INR (≈$7.9B) | 59 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score