Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited
How Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited stacks up
KC · against 444 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
68/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #135 of 445 · scores higher than 69% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score43 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including KC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 68?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -6.2% vs peer median 2.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 88% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 9.2% vs peer median 2.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 90% of peers. EBITDA yield: 8.7% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 439 reported | Not reported | 2.4% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 449 reported | 13.8% | 4.5% | 91% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 177 reported | 9.2% | 3.4% | 85% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 441 reported | 61.1% | 30.6% | 84% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 27.5B HKD (≈$3.5B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 3 | 16.7B HKD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 3 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 98 | 94 | |
| 127 | 12.0B SEK (≈$1.2B) | 69 | 56 | |
| 135 | 21.5B CNY (≈$3.0B) | 68 | 66 | |
| 135 | 1.8B USD | 68 | 63 | |
| 135 | 2.3B USD | 68 | 67 | |
| 135 | 2.3B USD | 68 | 40 | |
| 139 | 50.0B TWD (≈$1.5B) | 67 | 57 | |
| 139 | 92.4B TWD (≈$2.9B) | 67 | 52 | |
| 139 | 202.6B JPY (≈$1.4B) | 67 | 83 | |
| 139 | 625.9B JPY (≈$4.3B) | 67 | 69 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score