Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CTS · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Ranked #526 of 1,667 · scores higher than 68% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score166 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including CTS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
| Metric | CTS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | 3.8% | 2.3% | 66% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 7.1% | 4.3% | 69% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | 5.1% | 2.7% | 66% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | 31.9% | 33.4% | 48% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 526 | 961.5B JPY (≈$6.5B) | 68 | 75 | |
| 526 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 21.5B CNY (≈$3.0B) |
| 68 |
| 66 |
| 526 | 6.8B TWD (≈$210M) | 68 | 47 |
| 526 | 4.0B TWD (≈$126M) | 68 | 32 |
| 526 | 1.8B USD | 68 | 63 |
| 526 | 2.3B USD | 68 | 67 |
| 526 | 72.6B INR (≈$871M) | 68 | 69 |
| 526 | 11.3B USD | 68 | 68 |
| 526 | 2.3B USD | 68 | 40 |