Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Skyline Builders Group Holding Limited
How Skyline Builders Group Holding Limited stacks up
KAZR · against 471 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
0/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #467 of 472 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score52 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including KAZR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -23.1% vs peer median 6.9%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -15.8% vs peer median 3.8%
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KAZR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KAZR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 468 reported | -15.8% | 3.1% | 10% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 472 reported | -23.1% | 6.3% | 4% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 431 reported | Not reported | 3.4% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 466 reported | 399.5% | 31.7% | 100% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KAZR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 459M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 312M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 3.4B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 5 | 2.8B USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 466 | 1.79T USD | 7 | 38 | |
| 467 | 1.3B USD |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score