Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
KALU · against 1,354 other Basic Materials companies
Ranked #1,211 of 1,355 · scores higher than 11% of peers · safety percentile 11
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)135 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including KALU · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | KALU | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,322 reported | 1.13× | 0.36× | 12% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,325 reported | 1.58 | 0.66 | 8% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,285 reported | 2.50× | 1.77× | 70% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26.3B INR (≈$316M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 226M USD | 100 | 68 | |
| 3 | 6.4B CNY (≈$902M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 3 | 7.6B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 3 | 17.3B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1,207 | 697.6B JPY (≈$4.7B) | 11 | 38 | |
| 1,208 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 2.96T IDR (≈$184M) |
| 11 |
| 22 |
| 1,209 | 347.1B JPY (≈$2.4B) | 11 | 63 |
| 1,210 | 32.1B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 11 | 32 |
| 1,211 | 1.9B USD | 11 | 66 |
| 1,212 | 8.9B AUD (≈$5.9B) | 11 | 61 |
| 1,213 | 14.2B TRY (≈$427M) | 10 | 9 |
| 1,214 | 3.0B SGD (≈$2.2B) | 10 | 43 |
| 1,215 | 10.5B EUR (≈$11.5B) | 10 | 37 |