Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Kadant Inc.
How Kadant Inc. stacks up
KAI · against 445 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
62/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #205 of 446 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score48 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including KAI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 3.4% vs peer median 7.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 64% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 7.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 76% of peers. Revenue growth: 12.5% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KAI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KAI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 462 reported | 12.5% | 8.4% | 63% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 328 reported | 3.4% | 9.2% | 40% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 437 reported | 7.3% | 5.2% | 61% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KAI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 727M USD | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 205 | 9.9B USD | 62 | 63 | |
| 205 | 3.9B USD | 62 | 71 | |
| 205 | 2.4B USD | 62 | 33 | |
| 205 | 3.5B USD | 62 | 63 | |
| 205 | 3.3B USD | 62 | 57 | |
| 205 | 270M USD | 62 | 41 | |
| 205 | 4.0B USD | 62 | 69 | |
| 212 | 850M USD | 61 | 32 | |
| 212 | 5.3B USD | 61 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score