Ranked #278 of 406 · scores higher than 31% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score
40 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including JPM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 30?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its book yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼a higher price relative to book value (P/B): weaker than 86% of peers. Book yield: 42.8% vs peer median 77.7%
▼lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 61% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.4% vs peer median 8.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = JPM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
JPM
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Earnings yieldHigher is better · 407 reported
7.1%
8.2%
36%
60%
EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 105 reported
Not reported
11.4%
—
—
Context only
Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 366 reported
-18.6%
9.2%
4%
Context only
Book yieldHigher is better · 389 reported
40.4%
74.6%
14%
40%
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
