Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
How Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated stacks up
JLL · against 52 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
70/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #8 of 53 · scores higher than 83% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score7 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including JLL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 70?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, which is stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 6.5% vs peer median 6.5%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.6% vs peer median 5.3%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 81% of peers. EBITDA yield: 8.3% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = JLL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | JLL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 54 reported | 5.6% | 3.9% | 75% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 51 reported | 8.3% | 5.6% | 96% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 36 reported | 6.5% | 5.4% | 74% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 54 reported | 43.3% | 51.7% | 38% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around JLL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.85T JPY (≈$19.4B) | 90 | 67 | |
| 2 | 10.1B USD | 87 | 53 | |
| 3 | 13.7B USD | 81 | 70 | |
| 4 | 26.9B USD | 77 | 78 | |
| 4 | 13.8B EUR (≈$15.2B) | 77 | 36 | |
| 6 | 91.4B HKD (≈$11.7B) | 73 | 79 | |
| 6 | 14.1B USD | 73 | 69 | |
| 8 | 17.2B USD | 70 | 67 | |
| 8 | 10.3B EUR (≈$11.3B) | 70 | 57 | |
| 8 | 12.9B EUR (≈$14.2B) | 70 | 63 | |
| 11 | 54.5B BRL (≈$9.8B) | 69 | 53 | |
| 12 | 11.7B USD | 68 | 80 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score