Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to JD.com, Inc.
How JD.com, Inc. stacks up
JD · against 67 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
63/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #19 of 68 · scores higher than 73% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score5 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including JD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 63?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 9.3% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 61% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.6% vs peer median 4.4%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 82% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 15.2% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = JD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | JD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 65 reported | 5.6% | 4.7% | 67% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 69 reported | 9.3% | 7.3% | 69% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 39 reported | 15.2% | 4.4% | 100% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 65 reported | 92.5% | 19.8% | 91% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around JD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 219.5B CNY (≈$30.7B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 2 | 37.54T KRW (≈$27.0B) | 97 | 65 | |
| 2 | 150.1B HKD (≈$19.2B) | 97 | 79 | |
| 4 | 4.04T JPY (≈$27.5B) | 93 | 76 | |
| 5 | 31.01T KRW (≈$22.3B) | 91 | 59 | |
| 14 | 24.8B USD | 70 | 64 | |
| 16 | 39.3B USD | 68 | 53 | |
| 17 | 34.3B USD | 67 | 60 | |
| 18 | 24.2B USD | 65 | 66 | |
| 19 | 36.3B USD | 63 | 49 | |
| 20 | 151.9B HKD (≈$19.4B) | 61 | 77 | |
| 21 | 40.6B USD | 58 | 61 | |
| 22 | 526.8B ZAR (≈$29.0B) | 54 | 59 | |
| 23 | 21.7B USD | 53 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score