Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
JD · against 68 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #20 of 69 · scores higher than 72% of peers · safety percentile 61
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)4 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including JD · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger beta, but weaker current ratio than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | JD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 66 reported | 0.37× | 0.84× | 66% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 69 reported | 0.34 | 0.81 | 82% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 65 reported | 1.14× | 1.33× | 41% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.98T JPY (≈$27.1B) | 94 | 74 | |
| 2 | 5.71T JPY (≈$38.8B) | 93 | 82 | |
| 3 | 24.2B USD | 92 | 66 | |
| 4 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 92 | 91 | |
| 5 | 20.5B USD | 89 | 50 | |
| 16 | 39.0B AUD (≈$25.7B) | 70 | 60 | |
| 17 | 22.7B USD | 66 | 55 | |
| 18 | 216.5B HKD (≈$27.7B) | 64 | 76 | |
| 19 | 26.1B USD | 63 | 81 | |
| 20 | 36.3B USD | 61 | 49 | |
| 21 | 150.1B HKD (≈$19.2B) | 58 | 79 | |
| 22 | 198.5B CNY (≈$27.8B) | 57 | 70 | |
| 23 | 219.5B CNY (≈$30.7B) | 56 | 66 | |
| 24 | 3.38T JPY (≈$23.0B) | 54 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score