Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to JD.com, Inc.
How JD.com, Inc. stacks up
JD · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
46/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #227 of 356 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score38 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including JD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 46?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, but weaker earnings per share growth than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 90% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -52.0% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 64% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 7.8% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 80% of peers. Revenue growth: 13.0% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = JD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | JD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 13.0% | 5.9% | 74% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | -52.0% | 6.2% | 14% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | 7.8% | 4.1% | 64% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around JD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 222 | 237M USD | 47 | 35 | |
| 227 | 1.7B USD | 46 | 44 | |
| 227 | 3.7B USD | 46 | 66 | |
| 227 | 5.1B USD | 46 | 46 | |
| 227 | 36.3B USD | 46 | 49 | |
| 231 | 5.4B USD | 45 | 46 | |
| 231 | 4.7B USD | 45 | 61 | |
| 233 | 2.1B USD | 44 | 30 | |
| 233 | 119.7B USD | 44 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score