Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
JBTM · against 430 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #248 of 431 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score64 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including JBTM · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
| Metric | JBTM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 421 reported | 3.1% | 4.2% | 31% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 434 reported | 8.3% | 7.8% | 55% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 199 reported | 5.1% | 4.0% | 61% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 420 reported | 73.3% | 38.7% | 81% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 3 | 26.4B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 2.8B EUR (≈$3.1B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 9.3B SGD (≈$7.1B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 248 | 47.9B CNY (≈$6.7B) | 49 | 81 | |
| 248 | 10.0B USD | 49 | 60 | |
| 248 | 5.0B CHF (≈$5.8B) | 49 | 45 | |
| 248 | 9.1B GBP (≈$11.8B) | 49 | 47 | |
| 248 | 6.1B USD | 49 | 55 | |
| 248 | 8.9B GBP (≈$11.6B) | 49 | 51 | |
| 248 | 10.2B USD | 49 | 55 | |
| 248 | 3.5B USD | 49 | 23 | |
| 256 | 25.3B HKD (≈$3.2B) | 48 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score