Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Jack in the Box Inc.
How Jack in the Box Inc. stacks up
JACK · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
77/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #92 of 356 · scores higher than 73% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score46 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including JACK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 77?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 87% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -6.1% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 83% of peers. Revenue growth: 14.3% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = JACK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | JACK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 14.3% | 5.9% | 77% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | Not reported | 6.2% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | -6.1% | 4.1% | 10% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around JACK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.9B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 2.9B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 46.3B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 18.2B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 281M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 86 | 1.4B USD | 78 | 28 | |
| 86 | 45.3B USD | 78 | 54 | |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score