Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IVVD · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #350 of 1,373 · scores higher than 75% of peers · safety percentile 75
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including IVVD · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IVVD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.05× | 0.24× | 76% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 0.95 | 0.53 | 27% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 5.87× | 2.62× | 78% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 346 | 6.0B CNY (≈$841M) | 75 | 50 | |
| 347 | 1.09T JPY (≈$7.4B) | 75 | 75 | |
| 348 | 1.6B HKD (≈$209M) | 75 | 54 | |
| 349 | 4.5B TWD (≈$138M) | 75 | 62 | |
| 350 | 172M USD | 75 | 41 | |
| 351 | 16.9B THB (≈$474M) | 74 | 65 | |
| 352 | 14.87T KRW (≈$10.7B) | 74 | 76 | |
| 353 | 16.2B THB (≈$453M) | 74 | 63 | |
| 354 | 3.8B CNY (≈$531M) | 74 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score