Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IVVD · against 214 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #61 of 215 · scores higher than 72% of peers · safety percentile 75
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)11 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including IVVD · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IVVD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 191 reported | 0.05× | 0.23× | 75% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 202 reported | 0.95 | 0.62 | 34% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 210 reported | 5.87× | 3.03× | 72% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 2 | 165M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 3 | 261M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 4 | 2.3B CNY (≈$318M) | 99 | 68 | |
| 5 | 284M AUD (≈$188M) | 98 | 36 | |
| 57 | 106M EUR (≈$116M) | 75 | 46 | |
| 58 | 117M USD | 75 | 40 | |
| 59 | 1.6B HKD (≈$209M) | 75 | 54 | |
| 60 | 4.5B TWD (≈$138M) | 75 | 62 | |
| 61 | 172M USD | 75 | 41 | |
| 62 | 3.0B SEK (≈$301M) | 74 | 56 | |
| 63 | 264M USD | 73 | 30 | |
| 64 | 287.6B KRW (≈$207M) | 72 | ||
| 65 | 1.9B CNY (≈$270M) | 72 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score