Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Integra Resources Corp.
How Integra Resources Corp. stacks up
ITRG · against 1,320 other Basic Materials companies
Valuation
84/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #206 of 1,321 · scores higher than 84% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score132 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including ITRG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 84?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, which is stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -0.6% vs peer median 3.6%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 6.9% vs peer median 2.6%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 92% of peers. EBITDA yield: 24.5% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ITRG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ITRG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,281 reported | 2.0% | 3.8% | 37% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,352 reported | 24.5% | 8.6% | 92% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 409 reported | 1.2% | 2.6% | 43% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,275 reported | 66.9% | 61.0% | 54% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ITRG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 577.1B KRW (≈$416M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 219M MYR (≈$48M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 63M MYR (≈$14M) | 100 | 68 | |
| 1 | 1.39T ARS (≈$1.4B) | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 224.2B CLP (≈$247M) | 100 | 47 | |
| 206 | 41.2B USD | 84 | 88 | |
| 206 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score