Ranked #2,206 of 2,437 · scores higher than 9% of peers · safety percentile 9
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)
244 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including ITG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why “Higher relative risk”?
The measures below combine into a safety percentile of 9 among Industrials companies. It is relative: 67 or more is lower relative risk, 33–66 moderate, below 33 higher.
Mainly because of its debt / equity, which is weaker than most Industrials peers.
▼more borrowing relative to shareholders' equity: weaker than 99% of peers. Debt / equity: 25.46× vs peer median 0.40×
●Beta is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
▲more short-term assets to cover bills due within a year: stronger than 82% of peers. Current ratio: 2.80× vs peer median 1.62×
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ITG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
ITG
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Debt / equityLower is better · 2,360 reported
25.46×
0.41×
1%
33%
BetaLower is better · 2,360 reported
Not reported
0.61
—
—
33%
Current ratioHigher is better · 2,374 reported
2.80×
1.62×
82%
33%
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
Zhejiang Tuna Environmental Science & TechnologyCo.,Ltd.603177.SS · China
