Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IRTC · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #1,283 of 1,373 · scores higher than 7% of peers · safety percentile 7
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)138 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including IRTC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IRTC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 3.91× | 0.24× | 3% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 1.32 | 0.53 | 15% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 3.85× | 2.62× | 65% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 1,279 | 10.8B JPY (≈$73M) | 7 | 27 | |
| 1,280 | 334M USD | 7 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 53 |
| 1,281 | 3.4B JPY (≈$23M) | 7 | 5 |
| 1,282 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 7 | 17 |
| 1,283 | 4.2B USD | 7 | 41 |
| 1,284 | 3.4B SEK (≈$337M) | 6 | 45 |
| 1,285 | 1.2B USD | 6 | 3 |
| 1,286 | 1.9B EUR (≈$2.1B) | 6 | 52 |
| 1,287 | 17M USD | 6 | 10 |